EDITORIAL: Jamia Prof. Accused of Hate Speech Against Muslims, Chooses Not to Respond to Allegations

On Saturday, Sept. 9, several online news websites, which cover news related to Jamia Millia Islamia, reported a controversial incident involving a Jamia professor at the Center for Management Studies.

According to these news portals — namely, TwoCircles.net, BeyondHeadlines.in and OkhlaTimes.com — on Wednesday, Sept. 7, Professor Prahalad K. Basu while taking an MBA class at the center, went on a tirade denouncing Jamia “as a third class minority university” and branded the students as “idiots” and “illiterate.”

He is quoted to have allegedly said: “This is a third class minority university … you are idiots … you all are illiterate … why am I wasting my time here?”

These reports go on further to allege that he later picked on a burqa-wearing girl and made her cry in class, by allegedly saying to her: “you black head girl, why you are wearing this dress while it is being banned in some countries.”

Although the professor’s remarks were offensive, to say the least, some of his former students have played the situation down by saying that this kind of behavior is not out of character for Professor Basu. An unnamed former student of his was quoted in the Okhla Times to have said: “This is something that was expected of him. A highly educated professor, he is short tempered and known for using abusive language.”

However, what made his statements on that day significant is the fact that they were made after the Delhi High Court bomb blast, which occurred earlier the same day.

There is no evidence to suggest his statements were made in light of the bomb blast, but that is apparently how it got viewed.

Remarks which probably would have been dismissed on any other day, like his students have been apparently doing until now, all of a sudden seemed to be communally tinted.

Students angry and upset by his remarks, agitated and wrote a letter of complaint to the acting director of the center, Professor U.M. Amin, demanding disciplinary action against the professor.

Reportedly, the director resolved the matter by asking the students to not to attend his class.

The matter was resolved for the students in question, apparently; however, the issue did not die down for other students in  the university.

Among others, the Students Islamic Organization (SIO) rallied on the issue and demanded the professor to be sacked from his position at Jamia.

Jamia Takes Action Against the Professor

On Monday, Sept. 12, Jamia sent out a press release stating that they had taken a serious note of the inflammatory comments made by the professor which were deemed “personal and communal against students and the University causing deep anguish among students and faculty.”

Taking cognizance of this fact, it further stated that Jamia will prosecute Prof. Basu for “libel” and “terminate all future association with him.”

What is so blatantly obvious in this entire episode, was the absence of Prof. Basu’s voice. Everyone had a say in the press except Professor Basu. Nobody was reporting what the professor had to say on the matter.

It could not be known whether he was denying the allegations or not?

And a lot of people online expressed the need to hear the other side of the story before the professor was figuratively burned at the stake. People,  in all fairness, wanted to hear what the professor had to say on the matter before they came to a conclusion about him.

Professor Basu Speaks to Jamia Journal

Wanting to hear all sides to the story, I, along with few of his former students, went to see the professor at his residence in Noida, on Monday evening, just hours after the news of his apparent termination of service from Jamia was made public by the university.

Although the professor welcomed us into his home and treated us with gracious hospitality, he refused to speak to us about the incident on the record.

Professor Basu made it clear to me, right in the beginning of our conversation that he did not want me to report on anything from our conversation with him. He even refused to get his picture taken.

He spoke to us for at least two hours on a myriad of topics, including the incident in question, but again, did not give me permission to report or quote him on anything he had to say.

He even responded to the allegations leveled against him, and yet, sadly, I cannot report on what he said.

I will say this much though: Professor Basu believes that in the end, the facts of the matter will be known, and the truth will set the record straight.

However, it seems, he does not wish to play any role in order for that to happen.

He gave me no reasons on why he did not wish to speak to the press; besides maybe his belief that the Indian press is a “third rate” press. A comment seemingly made with no conviction.

Every other thing it seemed was of “third rate” or “third class” to him.

Based on our conversation it seems, he probably did say what he is being accused of; but just like his comment on the Indian press, it was probably not made with the conviction of belief. Neither did it seem to me that he was a bigot who held anti-Muslim and anti-Islam views.

The man seems to have an eccentric personality, and just like some of his former students have said, I feel it is in Professor Basu’s nature to make offensive statements which he probably doesn’t mean.

It is unfortunate that he did not wish to speak on the issue much and clear my doubts. And it is beyond unfortunate that he did not wish to speak on the record.

About Khalid Jaleel

Khalid Jaleel is a PhD student in the Department of Political Science. He can be reached via email at: khalidj [at] jamiajournal.com

Check Also

Be Kind to Dogs, and Students

Cruelty to animals is a serious offense. There can be no justification for hurting a ...


  1. What u will say to those professors who even don’t come to take the class and openley say that they will not teach.. students largely believes that these teachers don’t have any knowledge and expertise, what u will say on these teachers. No body can complain on this, as student feared of their marks and their career. But prof. basu were sacked and mistreated because he was the guest teacher, if he was the permanent teacher then no body will dare to say anything against him.

    I know and all know that prof. who is teaching in Jamia for the last 10 years can’t say these words, who were teaching in jamia without any pay. This is the part of propaganda against non muslim teachers to bar them to come and teach in the university. This is really sad, Can u believe a teacher who is there in jamia teaching without any self interest can say these words, it is simply false and done to scatter the image of the jamia and its non muslim teachers. Do any one have the recording of this incidence, is there anyone who can speak openly by facing Prof Basu eye and eye,, no body can do this….Because this incidence which is artificial has never happened…
    That’s all i want to say on it.

  2. Silence is the biggest speaker. Prof. Basu silence on this matter prove that this allegation is false and null against him. As the old saying goes “The best way to deny false charge and lies is to remain silent. ”
    If prof. basu say anything in his defence of this false allegation then it will prove out that he has done something wrong. So he is doing right thing to not to speak on this false case against him. Truth can’t be denied even after saying 100+ lies against the truth, Time will tell that prof. basu being wrongly being made the accuse of that thing that he never done.
    The writer comment on prof basu by saying he is thinking that this is all third grade, shows immaturity and wrong sense. One can’t be on the conclusion without any solid fact and finding. This is a part of big conspiracy to scatter the image of teachers like Prof basu.

Leave a Reply